Difference between Astro JS and Next JS



What is Next JS?

Next.js is popular open-source JavaScript framework for building server-rendered React applications. It is developed by Vercel, an online app development organization, aims to provide server-side rendering capabilities to React application. Next.js is know for it's SEO optimizations and customizations in rendering approaches such as SSR, SSG, ISR, etc.

Features of Next JS

  • Supports SSR and SSG for full stack development
  • Includes file-system based routing
  • Automatic Code Splitting to improve page load speed
  • Builtin optimizations for images, fonts, scripts, memory and bundles
  • TypeScript support

What is Astro JS?

Astro is a new JavaScript framework optimized for static site generation, with support for server-side rendering. Astro focuses of optimizing content focused website which are not regularly updated. For example, once a blog page has been written and published, its contents are unlikely to be modified, making it appropriate for serving from static hosting.

Features of AstroJS

  • Uses Island Architecture to reduce JavaScript load
  • Highly optimized for static content as no JavaScript is loaded by default.
  • Supports SSG by default, but can also be configured to support SSR
  • Markdown/MDX support
  • Includes optimization for images and other assets

Features Comparison Astro vs Next JS

Here is tabular comparison of Astro vs Next JS features.

Feature Astro.js Next.js
Framework Type Static site generator Full-stack React framework
Rendering Static Site Generation (SSG) by default; supports SSR via adapters Supports SSG, SSR, ISR, and client-side rendering
Component Support Supports multiple UI frameworks (React, Vue, Svelte, Solid, etc.) Primarily React-based
Performance Highly optimized for static content; ships zero JavaScript by default Optimized but may ship JavaScript depending on rendering mode
Server-side Support Requires adapters for SSR and API routes Built-in API routes and server-side rendering
Routing File-based routing, like Next.js File-based routing with dynamic routes
Data Fetching Uses getStaticPaths, getStaticProps for static content Supports getStaticProps, getServerSideProps, and API routes
Hydration Islands architecture loads JavaScript only where needed Fully hydrates React components on the client
Edge Support Requires adapters for deployment on edge networks Supports Edge Functions natively with Vercel
Bundling & Optimization Optimized for minimal client-side JS; removes unused JavaScript Optimized for performance, but React hydration adds overhead
Middleware No built-in middleware, but supports custom solutions Built-in middleware support
Deployment Works with Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare, and other static hosts Optimized for Vercel but works on multiple platforms
Best Use Case Content-heavy sites, blogs, documentation Full-stack applications, dashboards, dynamic websites

Architecture Comparison Astro vs Next JS

Here we made detailed comparison of Astro and Next.js architecture using flowchart.

Next JS Architecture

The flowchart below, shows the working of Next.js framework. As Next.js is a full-stack framework, it have deal with both frontend and backend code. For static routes, HTML is generated at build time itself, while for dynamic routes, Next.js uses server-side rendering to generate HTML at request time. Then, the HTML is sent to the client, where javascript hydrates the page.

NextJS Architecture

Astro Architecture

The flowchart shows the working of Astro framework. Astro supports any frontend framework for UI code, which then combined with backend code to generate full stack website. The static websites can be hosted on platforms like GitHub, Firebase, and AWS S3, while server-rendered websites are commonly hosted on Vercel, Netlify, or AWS S3.

Astro JS Architecture
Advertisements