
- DBMS - Home
- DBMS - Overview
- DBMS - Architecture
- DBMS - Data Models
- DBMS - Data Schemas
- DBMS - Data Independence
- DBMS - System Environment
- Centralized and Client/Server Architecture
- DBMS - Classification
- Relational Model
- DBMS - Codd's Rules
- DBMS - Relational Data Model
- DBMS - Relational Model Constraints
- DBMS - Relational Database Schemas
- DBMS - Handling Constraint Violations
- Entity Relationship Model
- DBMS - ER Model Basic Concepts
- DBMS - ER Diagram Representation
- Relationship Types and Relationship Sets
- DBMS - Weak Entity Types
- DBMS - Generalization, Aggregation
- DBMS - Drawing an ER Diagram
- DBMS - Enhanced ER Model
- Subclass, Superclass and Inheritance in EER
- Specialization and Generalization in Extended ER Model
- Data Abstraction and Knowledge Representation
- Relational Algebra
- DBMS - Relational Algebra
- Unary Relational Operation
- Set Theory Operations
- DBMS - Database Joins
- DBMS - Division Operation
- DBMS - ER to Relational Model
- Examples of Query in Relational Algebra
- Relational Calculus
- Tuple Relational Calculus
- Domain Relational Calculus
- Relational Database Design
- DBMS - Functional Dependency
- DBMS - Inference Rules
- DBMS - Minimal Cover
- Equivalence of Functional Dependency
- Finding Attribute Closure and Candidate Keys
- Relational Database Design
- DBMS - Keys
- Super keys and candidate keys
- DBMS - Foreign Key
- Finding Candidate Keys
- Normalization in Database Designing
- Database Normalization
- First Normal Form
- Second Normal Form
- Third Normal Form
- Boyce Codd Normal Form
- Difference Between 4NF and 5NF
- Structured Query Language
- Types of Languages in SQL
- Querying in SQL
- CRUD Operations in SQL
- Aggregation Function in SQL
- Join and Subquery in SQL
- Views in SQL
- Trigger and Schema Modification
- Storage and File Structure
- DBMS - Storage System
- DBMS - File Structure
- DBMS - Secondary Storage Devices
- DBMS - Buffer and Disk Blocks
- DBMS - Placing File Records on Disk
- DBMS - Ordered and Unordered Records
- Indexing and Hashing
- DBMS - Indexing
- DBMS - Single-Level Ordered Indexing
- DBMS - Multi-level Indexing
- Dynamic B- Tree and B+ Tree
- DBMS - Hashing
- Transaction and Concurrency
- DBMS - Transaction
- DBMS - Concurrency Control
- DBMS - Deadlock
- Backup and Recovery
- DBMS - Data Backup
- DBMS - Data Recovery
- DBMS Useful Resources
- DBMS - Quick Guide
- DBMS - Useful Resources
- DBMS - Discussion
DBMS - Division Operation
In relational algebra, several operators are essential due to their unique functionalities. One such operator is the division operator, symbolized by "รท". This operator is relatively complex but plays a crucial role in solving queries that involve the "all" condition. While many relational algebra operations focus on combining or filtering data, the division operation identifies tuples in one relation that are associated with every tuple in another.
In this chapter, we'll explore the concept of the division operator in detail, understand its theoretical foundation, and walk through practical examples to grasp its application.
Basics of the Division Operator
The division operation applies to two relations โ
- Numerator Relation (R) โ Represents the main dataset and contains the superset of possible combinations.
- Denominator Relation (S) โ Represents the subset or the set of conditions that must be satisfied.
The result is a relation containing only those tuples from the numerator that are associated with every tuple in the denominator.
Attributes in Relations
Let's define the attributes involved in the division operator โ
- R(Z) is the numerator, where Z = X โช Y
- S(X) is the denominator
- T(Y) is the result
Here, T contains the attributes in R that are not in S. For a tuple to appear in T, it must pair with every tuple in S within R.
To better understand the concept, consider a real-world scenario. Suppose we are organizing a workshop. Participants (R) are linked to sessions (X). We want to find those participants who attended all required sessions (S). The division operator helps identify these individuals by evaluating the "all sessions attended" condition.
Step-by-Step Explanation of the Division Operator
The division operation ensures that each result tuple in T(Y) must appear in R(Z) in combination with every tuple in S(X). Any tuple in R that fails to match all tuples in S is excluded from the result.
Mathematical Representation
The division operator can be expressed using a combination of projection, Cartesian product, and difference โ
- T1 โ Identify all potential result tuples: T1 โ ฯY(R)
- T2 โ Find tuples in T1 that do not satisfy the pairing condition with S: T2 โ ฯY((S ร T1) โ R)
- Final Result โ Subtract the unsatisfying tuples from the potential results. T โ T1 โ T2
Example: Employees Working on All Projects
Let us take an example to get a clear understanding of how the division operator works.
Query โ Find the names of employees who work on all projects that "John Smith" works on.
Relations Involved โ Following are the relations involved in this query โ
WORKS_ON โ Contains tuples of employee IDs (Essn) and project numbers (Pno).
Essn | Pno | Hours |
---|---|---|
123456789 | 1 | 32.5 |
123456789 | 2 | 7.5 |
666884444 | 3 | 40.0 |
453453453 | 1 | 20.0 |
453453453 | 2 | 20.0 |
333445555 | 2 | 10.0 |
333445555 | 3 | 10.0 |
333445555 | 10 | 10.0 |
333445555 | 20 | 10.0 |
999887777 | 30 | 30.0 |
999887777 | 10 | 10.0 |
987987987 | 10 | 35.0 |
987987987 | 30 | 5.0 |
987654321 | 30 | 20.0 |
987654321 | 20 | 15.0 |
888665555 | 20 | NULL |
EMPLOYEE โ Contains personal details like Fname, Lname, and Ssn.
Fname | Minit | Lname | Ssn | Bdate | Address | Sex | Salary | Super_ssn | Dno |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John | B | Smith | 123456789 | 1965-01-09 | 731 Fondren, Houston, TX | M | 30000 | 333445555 | 5 |
Franklin | T | Wong | 333445555 | 1955-12-08 | 638 Voss, Houston, TX | M | 40000 | 888665555 | 5 |
Alicia | J | Zelaya | 999887777 | 1968-01-19 | 3321 Castle, Spring, TX | F | 25000 | 987654321 | 4 |
Jennifer | S | Wallace | 987654321 | 1941-06-20 | 291 Berry, Bellaire, TX | F | 43000 | 888665555 | 4 |
Ramesh | K | Narayan | 666884444 | 1962-09-15 | 975 Fire Oak, Humble, TX | M | 38000 | 333445555 | 5 |
Joyce | A | English | 453453453 | 1972-07-31 | 5631 Rice, Houston, TX | F | 25000 | 333445555 | 5 |
Ahmad | V | Jabbar | 987987987 | 1969-03-29 | 980 Dallas, Houston, TX | M | 25000 | 987654321 | 4 |
James | E | Borg | 888665555 | 1937-11-10 | 450 Stone, Houston, TX | M | 55000 | NULL | 1 |
Now, let's understand step-by-step how to find the names of employees who work on all projects that "John Smith" works on.
Retrieve John Smith's Projects
Start by filtering the projects linked to "John Smith."
$$\mathrm{SMITH \: โ \: ฯ_{Fname \:=\: 'John'\: AND\: Lname\:=\:'Smith'}\: (EMPLOYEE)}$$
Fname | Minit | Lname | Ssn | Bdate | Address | Sex | Salary | Super_ssn | Dno |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John | B | Smith | 123456789 | 1965-01-09 | 731 Fondren, Houston, TX | M | 30000 | 333445555 | 5 |
$$\mathrm{SMITH_PNOS \:โ\: ฯ_{Pno}\:(WORKS_ON\: \bowtie_{Essn \:=\: Ssn} SMITH)}$$
Pno |
---|
1 |
2 |
This gives a relation SMITH_PNOS containing all project numbers "John Smith" is assigned to.
Create All Employee-Project Relationships
Extract a relation showing all employees and their associated projects.
$$\mathrm{SSN_PNOS\: โ\: ฯ_{Essn,\: Pno}\:(WORKS_ON)}$$
Essn | Pno |
---|---|
123456789 | 1 |
123456789 | 2 |
666884444 | 3 |
453453453 | 1 |
453453453 | 2 |
333445555 | 2 |
333445555 | 3 |
333445555 | 10 |
333445555 | 20 |
999887777 | 30 |
999887777 | 10 |
987987987 | 10 |
987987987 | 30 |
987654321 | 30 |
987654321 | 20 |
888665555 | 20 |
Apply Division
Use the division operator to find employees whose project assignments cover all projects in SMITH_PNOS.
$$\mathrm{SSNS(Ssn)\: โ\: SSN_PNOS\: รท\: SMITH_PNOS}$$
Ssn |
---|
123456789 |
453453453 |
Map Employee IDs to Names
Finally, retrieve the names of these employees.
$$\mathrm{RESULT\: โ\: ฯ_{Fname,\: Lname}(SSNS\: \bowtie \: EMPLOYEE)}$$
Fname | Lname |
---|---|
John | Smith |
Joyce | English |
Final output โ The final relation contains the names of employees who work on all the projects that "John Smith" works on.
Generalized Example: Products and Suppliers
Scenario โ A store sells products (R) supplied by various suppliers (S). We want to identify products available from all suppliers.
Input Relations
- R โ Contains ProductID and SupplierID
- S โ Contains just SupplierID
Let's go through its steps.
Extract potential products โ
$$\mathrm{T1 \:โ\: ฯ_{ProductID}\: (R)}$$
Identify mismatched products โ
$$\mathrm{T2 \:โ\: ฯ_{ProductID}\: ((S\: ร\: T1)\: โ\: R)}$$
Subtract mismatches from potential products โ
$$\mathrm{T \:โ\: T1 \:โ\: T2}$$
Output โ If only certain products are supplied by every supplier, those product IDs will appear in the result relation T.
Key Observations
- Handling Universal Quantification โ The division operator is useful for queries that require "for all" conditions. This is like finding students enrolled in all mandatory courses or employees assigned to every project in a list.
- Limitations in SQL โ SQL does not directly support the division operator. However, similar results can be achieved using NOT EXISTS or complex joins. Although these approaches may lack the power of relational algebra.
- Practical Relevance โ While it is theoretically significant, division is less common in practical database management systems due to its complexity and rare use cases.
Additional Applications
- Matching Preferences โ Find customers whose preferences match every feature of a product.
- Cross-Department Participation โ Identify employees involved in activities across all departments.
Conclusion
In this chapter, we explored the division operator in relational algebra โ a powerful tool for handling queries with "all" conditions. We discussed its theoretical basis, mathematical formulation, and walked through detailed examples involving employee project and product supplier relationships. We also reviewed its limitations in SQL and noted its specialized role in database querying.