Data Structure
Networking
RDBMS
Operating System
Java
MS Excel
iOS
HTML
CSS
Android
Python
C Programming
C++
C#
MongoDB
MySQL
Javascript
PHP
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
Mathematics
English
Economics
Psychology
Social Studies
Fashion Studies
Legal Studies
- Selected Reading
- UPSC IAS Exams Notes
- Developer's Best Practices
- Questions and Answers
- Effective Resume Writing
- HR Interview Questions
- Computer Glossary
- Who is Who
Difference Between Reflecting and Refracting Telescopes
Observing and researching the night sky with the use of telescopes has been done for millennia. They have made it possible for us to investigate and get a better understanding of the cosmos in ways that were before inconceivable. There are many distinct varieties of telescopes, each of which has a number of pros and cons. Reflecting and refracting telescopes are both typical varieties of optical instruments known as telescopes.
Mirrors are used in reflecting telescopes to gather and focus light. Refracting telescopes use lenses to gather and focus light.
Read this article to find out more about Reflecting Telescopes and Refracting Telescopes and how they are different from each other.
What are Reflecting Telescopes?
Mirrors are used in reflecting telescopes to gather and focus light. They have a curved primary mirror that reflects incoming light onto a secondary mirror, which then reflects the light back into the eyepiece through a hole in the centre of the primary mirror. The eyepiece magnifies the image, making it clear and bright.
The main mirror of a reflecting telescope is shaped like a paraboloid and has a curvature that gives it that shape. Because of its form, the mirror is able to gather and concentrate incoming light onto a smaller secondary mirror, which is often positioned towards the top of the tube that houses the telescope. The light is focused into an eyepiece or camera after being reflected back down the tube by the secondary mirror and then exiting the main mirror through a hole in the center of that mirror.
The ability of reflecting telescopes to gather a huge amount of light is one of their primary advantages. A reflecting telescope's primary mirror can be much larger than a refracting telescope's objective lens, allowing for more light to be captured and, as a result, brighter and more detailed views of celestial objects. In addition, since mirrors can be produced with high precision, reflecting telescopes can create images with less distortion than refracting telescopes.
In comparison to a refracting telescope, a reflecting telescope can be manufactured in considerably larger sizes. This is one of the main benefits of the reflecting telescope. This is due to the fact that lenses can only be created to a certain size before they begin to distort the light that is allowed to flow through them, but mirrors can be made to a considerably greater size without causing the picture to become distorted. Because of this, reflecting telescopes are able to collect more light than other types of telescopes, making them superior for observing dim objects such as galaxies and nebulae at great distances.
What are Refracting Telescopes?
A refracting telescope consists of a long, narrow tube with a large lens at the front called the objective lens. Because the objective lens is curved and thicker in the centre than at the edges, light passing through it bends or refracts. The refracted light is then magnified and appears brighter and clearer after passing through a smaller lens called the eyepiece.
The light that enters a refracting telescope is collected and focused by lenses. The Dutch scholar and astronomer Hans Lippershey is credited with inventing the dioptric telescope in the early 17th century. Putting together a refracting telescope requires little effort. The telescope's picture is formed behind a massive lens known as the objective lens. Next, a secondary, smaller lens—the eyepiece lens—located relatively near the image generator is used to magnify the picture.
With refracting telescopes, the long, thin tube that keeps the lenses in place also acts as a light blocker, preventing unwanted light from entering the instrument. The objective lens is usually constructed from high-quality glass, and its overall form is thoughtfully crafted to reduce the distortion and aberration it introduces. Typically, the eyepiece lens is a straightforward magnifying lens that may be changed to modify the overall level of visual magnification.
The pictures produced by a refracting telescope may be sharper and less prone to aberrations and distortions than those produced by a reflecting telescope. When compared to reflecting telescopes, refracting telescopes are easier to operate and require less care.
Difference between Reflecting Telescopes and Refracting Telescopes
The following table highlights the major differences between Reflecting Telescopes and Refracting Telescopes −
Characteristics |
Reflecting Telescopes |
Refracting Telescopes |
|---|---|---|
Optical System |
Mirrors |
Lenses |
Obstruction |
Central obstruction |
No obstruction |
Cost |
less expensive |
more expensive |
Weight and portability |
Lighter and more portable |
Heavier and less portable |
Focal length |
Shorter relative to the aperture |
Longer relative to the aperture |
Image quality |
Generally good, but may require periodic mirror cleaning. |
Generally excellent, but may be affected by heat and atmospheric turbulence. |
Popular designs |
Newtonian, Cassegrain, and Ritchey-Chrétien |
Achromatic, apochromatic, and catadioptric |
Maintenance |
Require regular cleaning and maintenance of mirrors. |
Require less maintenance and cleaning of lenses. |
Conclusion
In conclusion, reflecting and refracting telescopes are two types of telescopes that are used to observe objects in the sky. Reflecting telescopes gather and focus light using mirrors, whereas refracting telescopes bend and focus light using lenses.
Each type of telescope has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Reflecting telescopes are less expensive and simpler to transport, while refracting telescopes provide greater image quality.
Finally, the choice between the two is based on the observer's individual needs and preferences.
574 Views
