On most digital cameras, you have quadrate pixels; they're in the similar transportation across the sensor and there's a strainer that gives red, green, and blue pixels. So, for the eye, think about a sensor with a great number of pixels, about 120 million.
There's an inflated thickness of pixels in the middle of the sensor, and only about 6 million of those sensors are strained to empower color responsiveness. And certainly, only about 100,000 sense for blue.
Yes and in passing, this sensor isn't made level, but actually, semi-globular, so that a too simple lens can be utilized without warped; actual camera lenses have to assign onto a level surface, which is less normally provided with the globular nature of a simple lens.
So that's the paraphernalia. But that's not the restricting feature on the effectual resolution. The eye appears to notice "continual," but it's recurrent, there's sort of a mounting rate that's actually swift, but that's not the essential one. The eye is in the persistent movement from ocular micro tremble that happens at around 70-110Hz.
Your brain is continuously combining the production of your eye as it's motioning around into the figure you literally discern, and the outcome is that, except something's motioning very swiftly, you get an effectual resolution which uplift from 120MP to something more similar to 480MP.
Which makes accurate sense is that our brains can perform this sort of issue as a side by side processor with act close to the speedy supercomputers we have developed. When we recognise a figure, there's this lower-level image processing, plus unique processes that work on higher level ideas.
For example, we humans are really good at recognizing horizontal and vertical lines, while our affable frog neighbors have specific processing in their comparatively easy brains searching for a small thing flying across the optical field.
We also do continuous pattern coordinating of what we notice back to our power of recalls of things. So we don't just notice an object, we immediately pick out an object and call up a complete library of details on that thing we have just seen.
All sorts of recent-model cameras can do come up with recollection and tracking, follow-emphasis, etc. They're nowhere close as superior to it as our eye/brain mixture, but they do fine for such frail hardware.