- Reasoning Test Preparation
- Reasoning - Home
- Reasoning - Overview
- Reasoning
Statement and Conclusions Online Quiz
Following quiz provides Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) related to Statement and Conclusions. You will have to read all the given answers and click over the correct answer. If you are not sure about the answer then you can check the answer using Show Answer button. You can use Next Quiz button to check new set of questions in the quiz.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 1 - Statement: Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.
Conclusions:
I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.
II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : C
Explanation
It has been clearly mentioned in the statement that the appointment of the bureaucrats only spoiled the financial institutions. So the person having experience in the similar field and expertise should be appointed. Hence both conclusions are valid.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 2 - Statement: Use “Nataraj” colours. Your work will speak for you.-An advertisement.
Conclusions:
I. People do not get biased by catchy slogans.
II. People like Kreyon colours.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : D
Explanation
The company is using catchy slogan because of the fact that catchy slogans do attract people. So conclusion I is not valid. People colour preference cannot be judged from the given statement too. So conclusion II also does not follow.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 3 - Statement: Bad behaviour of a student can cause defame to both the student and the school in which he is studying.
Conclusions:
I. Student showing bad behaviour should be removed from the school immediately.
II. By being strict, we cannot change the behaviour of a student.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : D
Explanation
Both the conclusions do not hold any strong support for the given statement. Hence neither of them are valid.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 4 - Statement: There is no meaning of democracy and political freedom until our country achieves economy equality.
Conclusions:
I. Democracy and political freedom run parallel.
II. To achieve real democracy and political freedom, it is necessary to bring economy equality.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : B
Explanation
No relation between the political freedom and democracy has been mentioned in the given statement. So conclusion I is not valid. But conclusion II is indirect replication of the given statement. Hence conclusion II is valid.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 5 - Statement: Currently India’s ranking in FIFA is increased.
Conclusions:
I. Our soccer players are working hard.
II. India is not good in soccer.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : A
Explanation
Here the conclusion II clearly talks in opposite against the given statement. Conclusion II however is the cause due to which statement has been told. Hence only conclusion is valid.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 6 - Statement: Home minister Rajnath Singh has approved 33% reservation for women in central armed police force.
Conclusions:
I. It will encourage the women to join the police force.
II. It is a next step by government towards women empowerment.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : E
Explanation
Both the conclusions are aiding complement to the given statement. Hence both are valid.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 7 - Statement: Nepal was selected by the UNICEF executive board.
Conclusions:
I. A bad news for India, as Nepal is trying to have a good relationship with China.
II. Nepal has been always been as a good friend to India.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : C
Explanation
Here any one of the two given conclusions can happen.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 8 - Statement: INS Kadmatt was commissioned in the Indian Navy to aid the Indian navy power.
Conclusions:
I. INS Kadamatt will strengthen our Naval power.
II. Regarding Navy, India need help from England.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : A
Explanation
Of course INS Kadamatt will increase the strength of our Navy that can be known by reading the given statement. No point has been told regarding the need to find help from England.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 9 - Statement: ISIS are murdering the citizens of Iraq and Iran.
Conclusions:
I. Life of remaining people in this country is in danger.
II. Strict actions should be taken against ISIS by UN government.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : E
Explanation
Here both the conclusions are valid because they are aiding to the given statement.
Each of the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Q 10 - Statement: A good manager can manage his team very well.
Conclusions:
I. A team always need a good manager.
II. Manager also needs group member’s support.
Options :
A - Only conclusion I is valid.
B - Only conclusion II is valid.
C - Either conclusion I or II is valid.
Answer : A
Explanation
Nothing specific has been told about manager’s requirement in conclusion II. However; conclusion I can be indirectly referred from the given statement.
To Continue Learning Please Login