Data Structure
Networking
RDBMS
Operating System
Java
MS Excel
iOS
HTML
CSS
Android
Python
C Programming
C++
C#
MongoDB
MySQL
Javascript
PHP
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
Mathematics
English
Economics
Psychology
Social Studies
Fashion Studies
Legal Studies
- Selected Reading
- UPSC IAS Exams Notes
- Developer's Best Practices
- Questions and Answers
- Effective Resume Writing
- HR Interview Questions
- Computer Glossary
- Who is Who
Difference between CORBA and DCOM
The world of technology and programming has developed a variety of languages and frameworks, each with its functionality and purpose. This article examines the differences between these two great technologies. In this article, we will the concept of CORBA and DCOM and its difference. CORBA, which has a strong presence in the business field, and DCOM, Microsoft's technology, each have different characteristics. Understanding these differences is important for developers and businesses trying to make informed decisions about their tech stack.
What is CORBA?
CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) is a middleware innovation that empowers interoperability and communication between disseminated program components in an organized environment. It gives a standardized system for making, getting to, and overseeing dispersed objects over distinctive programming dialects, working frameworks, and equipment stages.
At its core, CORBA characterizes a set of determinations, conventions, and interfacing that encourage communication and interaction between distributed objects. These objects can be composed of totally different programming dialects, such as Java, C++, or Python, and dwell on diverse machines inside an arrange. CORBA acts as a go-between or broker between these objects, permitting them to straightforwardly communicate and conjure strategies on each other, notwithstanding their area or usage dialect.
CORBA too characterizes a standard Interface Definition Language (IDL), which is utilized to portray the interfacing and operations of distributed objects. IDL gives a language-neutral detail for characterizing the structure, behavior, and communication conventions of objects. Through IDL, objects can be characterized in a platform-independent way, empowering interoperability between distinctive frameworks.
What is DCOM?
DCOM stands for Distributed Component Object Model, which may be an innovation created by Microsoft. It is an expansion of the Component Question Show (COM) that empowers computer program components to communicate and connect over organized boundaries in a conveyed computing environment
DCOM gives a system for building dispersed applications by permitting objects to be gotten to and conjured remotely on diverse computers associated with an arrangement. It empowers the advancement of disseminated frameworks where different components, dwelling on diverse machines, can collaborate and work together consistently
In DCOM, components are spoken to as objects and these objects can be found on distinctive machines inside an organization, and DCOM gives components for straightforwardly getting to and conjuring these objects as if they were nearby.
To encourage communication between DCOM components, each component is doled out a universally interesting identifier (GUID) that extraordinarily recognizes the protest over the organization. DCOM also provides highlights like question actuation, lifetime administration, security, and exchange bolster to guarantee solid and secure conveyed communication.
Differences between CORBA and DCOM
The differences are in the following table −
Basis Differences |
CORBA |
DCOM |
|---|---|---|
Definition |
CORBA may be a standard characterized by the Object Management Group (OMG) for creating distributed object-oriented frameworks. |
DCOM may be a Microsoft restrictive innovation that empowers communication between computer program components over an organized conveyed computing environment. |
Platform |
CORBA is platform-independent and can be actualized on different working frameworks and programming dialects. |
and can be actualized on different working frameworks and programming dialects. DCOM is planned for the Windows stage, although there are endeavors to supply interoperability with other stages. |
Interoperability |
CORBA gives interoperability between diverse programming dialects and stages through a common protest ask broker (ORB). |
DCOM centers on interoperability between components inside the Windows environment, permitting communication between objects executed in completely different dialects such as C++, Visual Essential, and Java. |
Architecture |
CORBA takes after client-server engineering, where clients conjure operations on inaccessible objects through the Sphere. |
DCOM takes after a component-based design, permitting objects to uncover their usefulness as COM (Component Protest Demonstrate) interfacing, which can be gotten to by other components |
Industry Adoption |
CORBA has seen widespread adoption across different businesses and includes a bigger biological system with multiple vendor implementations. |
DCOM has picked up ubiquity inside the Microsoft environment and is broadly utilized in Windows-based applications. |
Standardization |
CORBA is based on an open standard defined by the OMG, which permits multiple vendors to supply compliant executions |
DCOM may be an exclusive innovation created and controlled by Microsoft, restricting its standardization and interoperability with non-Microsoft stages. |
Conclusion
In conclusion, COBOL and DCOM represent different eras and paradigms in the world of programming. COBOL offers stability and reliability due to its longevity and widespread use in the enterprise sector. DCOM, on the other hand, provides a distributed component-based model aimed primarily at the Windows environment, enabling communication between software components over a network. COBOL is tailored to specific business needs and has a large code base in legacy systems, while DCOM's strength lies in its ability to integrate within the Microsoft ecosystem. Both technologies have their strengths and serve different purposes. Therefore, it is important to consider the specific needs of your project or organization when choosing between COBOL and DCOM.
301 Views
To Continue Learning Please Login