Protocol should be designed for security reasons. WebSocket is a brand-new protocol and not all web browsers implement it correctly. For example, some of them still allow the mix of HTTP and WS, although the specification implies the opposite. In this chapter, we will discuss a few common security attacks that a user should be aware of.
Denial of Service (DoS) attacks attempt to make a machine or network resource unavailable to the users that request it. Suppose someone makes an infinite number of requests to a web server with no or tiny time intervals. The server is not able to handle each connection and will either stop responding or will keep responding too slowly. This can be termed as Denial of service attack.
Denial of service is very frustrating for the end users, who could not even load a web page.
DoS attack can even apply on peer-to-peer communications, forcing the clients of a P2P network to concurrently connect to the victim web server.
Let us understand this with the help of an example.
Suppose a person A is chatting with his friend B via an IM client. Some third person wants to view the messages you exchange. So, he makes an independent connections with both the persons. He also sends messages to person A and his friend B, as an invisible intermediate to your communication. This is known as a man-in-the-middle attack.
The man-in-the-middle kind of attack is easier for unencrypted connections, as the intruder can read the packages directly. When the connection is encrypted, the information has to be decrypted by the attacker, which might be way too difficult.
From a technical aspect, the attacker intercepts a public-key message exchange and sends the message while replacing the requested key with his own. Obviously, a solid strategy to make the attacker's job difficult is to use SSH with WebSockets.
Mostly when exchanging critical data, prefer the WSS secure connection instead of the unencrypted WS.
By default, the WebSocket protocol is designed to be secure. In the real world, the user might encounter various issues that might occur due to poor browser implementation. As time goes by, browser vendors fix any issues immediately.
An extra layer of security is added when secure WebSocket connection over SSH (or TLS) is used.
In the WebSocket world, the main concern is about the performance of a secure connection. Although there is still an extra TLS layer on top, the protocol itself contains optimizations for this kind of use, furthermore, WSS works more sleekly through proxies.
Every message transmitted between a WebSocket server and a WebSocket client contains a specific key, named masking key, which allows any WebSocket-compliant intermediaries to unmask and inspect the message. If the intermediary is not WebSocket-compliant, then the message cannot be affected. The browser that implements the WebSocket protocol handles masking.
Finally, useful tools can be presented to investigate the flow of information between your WebSocket clients and server, analyze the exchanged data, and identify possible risks.
Chrome, Firefox, and Opera are great browsers in terms of developer support. Their built-in tools help us determine almost any aspect of client-side interactions and resources. It plays a great role for security purposes.