Punishments under IPC and BNS: A Comparative Analysis


“Punishments” under Indian Penal code defined in Chapter III; on the other hand, in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, it is defined under Chapter II. This chapter titled as “Of Punishment,” primarily, categorized punishment and then defined it. Furthermore, throughout the document, crimes are classified and respective punishments are defined. Punishment in respect to any crime is defined exclusively based on the type and degree of crime.

So, in this article, first will understand the meaning and types of punishment, as defined under the code, and then analyze the difference between the ‘punishment’ defined under IPC and newly legislated law Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Punishment Defined Under Indian Penal code, 1860

In Indian Penal Code, punishments are exclusively defined under Chapter III and titled as “Of Punishment.” This chapter, which has total 23 + 1 (=24) sections (Sections 53 to 75), describes a comprehensive perspective of punishments and their types. The punishments such as death penalty, imprisonment, fines, etc., are imposed as per the types and degree of offences. Some of the sections like 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, are already deleted from the code and section 55A added in the code.

Punishment Defined Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

In the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), punishments are explicitly defined under Chapter II and titled as “Of Punishment.” This chapter, which has total 10 Sections (Sections 4 to 13), comprehensively describes punishments and their types.

Punishments that defined under the Sanhita used throughout the document for different offences. The severity of the punishment depends on the nature and gravity of the offense committed. However, this is not so simple, as sometimes, even nature and gravity of offence is very high even if the punishment could be of lesser type because mens rea (guilty mind) is not present.

A Comparative Study of “Punishment” Defined Under IPC and BNS

The following table provides detailed analysis of Punishment as defined under IPC (primarily) and BNS (as per the recent legislation) −

Provision Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Indian Penal Code

Punishments

Sec. 4 − The punishments to which offenders are liable under the provisions of this Sanhita are—

(a) Death;

(b) Imprisonment for life;

(c) Imprisonment, which is of two descriptions, namely:—

(1) Rigorous, that is, with hard labour;

(2) Simple;

(d) Forfeiture of property;

(e) Fine;

Changes − the only change here is insertion of “Community Service".

Section 53 − Minor Change

Commutation of Sentence

Sec. 5 − The appropriate Government may, without the consent of the offender, commute any punishment under this Sanhita to any other punishment in accordance with section 474 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Sec. 54 − Commutation of sentence of death.—In every case in which sentence of death shall have been passed, [the appropriate Government] may, without the consent of the offender, commute the punishment for any other punishment provided by this Code.

Changes − Section 54 & 55 merged into Section 5 of BNSSecondly, Section 55A is defined as the Explanation of Section 5 of BNS.

Sec. 55 − Commutation of sentence of imprisonment for life.—In every case in which sentence of [imprisonment] for life shall have been passed, [the appropriate Government] may, without the consent

Explanation − For the purposes of this section the expression “appropriate Government” means,–

(a) in cases where the sentence is a sentence of death or is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends, the Central Government; and

(b) in cases where the sentence (whether of death or not) is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the State extends, the Government of the State within which the offender is sentenced

Sec. 55A: Definition of “appropriate Government”.—In sections fifty-four and fifty-five the expression “appropriate Government” means,—

(a) in cases where the sentence is a sentence of death or is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends, the Central Government; and

(b) in cases where the sentence (whether of death or not) is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the State extends, the Government of the State within which the offender is sentenced.]

Fractions of Terms of Punishment

Sec. 6 − In calculating fractions of terms of punishment, imprisonment for life shall be reckoned as equivalent to imprisonment for twenty years unless otherwise provided.

Section 57 − No change

Sentence may be (in certain Cases ofImprisonment) wholly or partly Rigorous or Simple

Sec. 7 − In every case in which an offender is punishable with imprisonment which may be of either description, it shall be competent to the Court which sentences such offender to direct in the sentence that such imprisonment shall be wholly rigorous, or that such imprisonment shall be wholly simple, or that any part of such imprisonment shall be rigorous and the rest simple.

Amount of Fine, Liability in Default of Payment of Fine, etc.

Sec. 8(1) − Where no sum is expressed to which a fine may extend, the amount of fine to which the offender is liable is unlimited, but shall not be excessive.

Section 63 − No change

Sec. 8(2) − In every case of an offence –

(a) punishable with imprisonment as well as fine, in which the offender is sentenced to a fine, whether with or without imprisonment;

(b) punishable with imprisonment or fine, or with fine only, in which the offender is sentenced to a fine, it shall be competent to the Court which sentences such offender to direct by the sentence that, in default of payment of the fine, the offender shall suffer imprisonment for a certain term, in which imprisonment shall be in excess of any other imprisonment to which he may have been sentenced or to which he may be liable under a commutation of a sentence.

Section 64 − No change

Sec. 8(3) − The term for which the Court directs the offender to be imprisoned in default of payment of a fine shall not exceed one-fourth of the term of imprisonment which is the maximum fixed for the offence, if the offence be punishable with imprisonment as well as fine.

Section 65 − No change

Sec. 8(4) − The imprisonment which the Court imposes in default of payment of a fine or in default of community service may be of any description to which the offender might have been sentenced for the offence.

Change − the clause or in default of community service added

Section 66 − Minor change

Sec. 8(5) − If the offence is punishable with fine or community service, the imprisonment which the Court imposes in default of payment of the fine or in default of community service shall be simple, and the term for which the Court directs the offender to be imprisoned, in default of payment of fine or in default of community service, shall not exceed, —

(a) two months when the amount of the fine does not exceed five thousand rupees;

(b) four months when the amount of the fine does not exceed ten thousand rupees; and

(c) one year in any other case

Changes −

  • Community Service added; and

  • Amount is increased from 50 rupees to 5,000 rupees and 100 rupees to 10,000 rupees.

  • Period increased from 6 months to 1 year

Section 67 − Imprisonment for non-payment of fine, when offence punishable with fine only. — If the offence be punishable with fine only, [the imprisonment which the Court imposes in default of payment of the fine shall be simple, and] the term for which the Court directs the offender to be imprisoned, in default of payment of fine, shall not exceed the following scale, that is to say, for any term not exceeding two months when the amount of the fine shall not exceed fifty rupees, and for any term not exceeding four months when the amount shall not exceed one hundred rupees, and for any term not exceeding six months in any other case.

Sec. 8(6) −

(a) The imprisonment which is imposed in default of payment of a fine shall terminate whenever that fine is either paid or levied by process of law;

(b) If, before the expiration of the term of imprisonment fixed in default of payment, such a proportion of the fine be paid or levied that the term of imprisonment suffered in default of payment is not less than proportional to the part of the fine still unpaid, the imprisonment shall terminate.

Section 68 & Section 69: No change

Sec. 8(7) − The fine, or any part thereof which remains unpaid, may be levied at any time within six years after the passing of the sentence, and if, under the sentence, the offender be liable to imprisonment for a longer period than six years, then at any time previous to the expiration of that period; and the death of the offender does not discharge from the liability any property which would, after his death, be legally liable for his debts.

Section 70 − No change

Limit of Punishment of Offence made up of Several Offences.

Sec. 9(1) − Where anything which is an offence is made up of parts, any of which parts is itself an offence, the offender shall not be punished with the punishment of more than one of such his offences, unless it be so expressly provided.

Section 71 − No change

Sec. 9(2) − Where—

(a) anything is an offence falling within two or more separate definitions of any law in force for the time being by which offences are defined or punished; or

(b) several acts, of which one or more than one would by itself or themselves constitute an offence, constitute, when combined, a different offence, the offender shall not be punished with a more severe punishment than the Court which tries him could award for any one of such offences.

Section 71 − No change

Punishment of Person Guilty of one of Several Offences,Judgment Stating that it is Doubtful of which.

Sec. 10 − In all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one of several offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is guilty, the offender shall be punished for the offence for which the lowest punishment is provided if the same punishment is not provided for all.

Section 72 − No change

Solitary Confinement.

Sec. 11 − Whenever any person is convicted of an offence for which under this Sanhita the Court has power to sentence him to rigorous imprisonment, the Court may, by its sentence, order that the offender shall be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of the imprisonment to which he is sentenced, not exceeding three months in the whole, according to the following scale, namely:—

(a) a time not exceeding one month if the term of imprisonment shall not exceed six months;

(b) a time not exceeding two months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed six months and shall not exceed one year;

(c) a time not exceeding three months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed one year

Section 73 − No change

Limit of Solitary Confinement

Sec. 12 − In executing a sentence of solitary confinement, such confinement shall in no case exceed fourteen days at a time, with intervals between the periods of solitary confinement of not less duration than such periods; and when the imprisonment awarded shall exceed three months, the solitary confinement shall not exceed seven days in any one month of the whole imprisonment awarded, with intervals between the periods of solitary confinement of not less duration than such periods.

Section 74 − No change

Enhanced Punishment for certain Offences after Previous Conviction

Sec. 13 − Whoever, having been convicted by a Court in India, of an offence punishable under Chapter X or Chapter XVII of this Sanhita with imprisonment of either description for a term of three years or upwards, shall be guilty of any offence punishable under either of those Chapters with like imprisonment for the like term, shall be subject for every such subsequent offence to imprisonment for life, or to imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years.

Section 75 − No change

Sections Permanently Deleted

Note − All these sections were deleted much before the legislation of BNS

Sections − 56, 58, 59, 61, & 62.

Conclusion

Punishment, which is awarded to an accused after proven guilty by a competent court, is one of the key features of criminal legal system. Based on the type of offence along with its severity, the punishment is decided. So, the substantial criminal law i.e. the Indian Penal Code and now the revised version i.e. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, has defined the term and its type comprehensively.

Though the newly legislated Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, primarily, retains most of the provisions of Indian Penal Code, defined under the Chapter III titled as “Of Punishment;” however, some minor changes can be seen in the form of language and its presentation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. How many sections are there in Chapter III, titled "Of Punishments," in the Indian Penal Code?

Ans. Originally, there are 23 + 1 (=24) Sections in the Chapter III of Indian Penal Code.

Q2. How many sections are there in Chapter II, titled "Of Punishments," in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?

Ans. There are total 10 Sections in the Chapter II of the BNS.

Q3. What is the major difference between the Chapter III of the Indian Penal Code and Chapter II of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?

Ans. The substantial differences between the chapter III of IPC and chapter II of BNS are −

  • Chapter number is different i.e. in IPC, it is Chapter III and in BNS, it is chapter II.

  • Number Sections is different i.e. in IPC, the total number is 24; whereas in BNS, the total number is merely 10.

  • Thirdly, all the repealed sections are deleted.

  • Fourthly, there are changes in languages and presentation of some of the provisions.

Updated on: 11-Jan-2024

139 Views

Kickstart Your Career

Get certified by completing the course

Get Started
Advertisements