Data Structure
Networking
RDBMS
Operating System
Java
MS Excel
iOS
HTML
CSS
Android
Python
C Programming
C++
C#
MongoDB
MySQL
Javascript
PHP
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
Mathematics
English
Economics
Psychology
Social Studies
Fashion Studies
Legal Studies
- Selected Reading
- UPSC IAS Exams Notes
- Developer's Best Practices
- Questions and Answers
- Effective Resume Writing
- HR Interview Questions
- Computer Glossary
- Who is Who
Difference between NAFTA and USMCA
The economic justification for free trade has remained the same, even though trade agreements in the United States were mostly negotiated by a small, easily managed group of politicians and business executives. When two parties engage in free commerce, everyone wins. Even though FTAs from the good old days seldom made headlines and were negotiated out of the public view, they were nonetheless sought because of their positive effects on society.
Since the 1980s when trade agreements failed to address major issues and exacerbated divisions over issues like labor rights, human rights, public health, and most importantly, environmental protection. The worldwide economic collapse precipitated this shift. Since it was signed, the North American Free Trade Pact (NAFTA) has been the subject of more study and debate than any other trade agreement in the history of the globe. From its inception until its eventual replacement by the USMCA, NAFTA was never without its detractors.
What is NAFTA?
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was negotiated and signed by the governments of the United States of America, Mexico, and Canada in December 1992. When January 1994 rolled around, the agreement took effect. In a historic move, George H.W. Bush, Carlos Salinas, and Brian Mulroney, the leaders of Mexico and Canada, signed an accord creating a trilateral trading bloc in North America. The treaty's stated purpose was to eliminate tariffs and other trade obstacles between signatory states as time went on. Former President Bill Clinton signed into law the North American Free Trade Deal (NAFTA), the first free trade agreement between a developing nation and industrial countries.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was essentially a revised and enlarged version of the original Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the United States (CUSFTA). NAFTA completed the unfinished work of the FTA by establishing regulations to safeguard intellectual property rights, avoid investment distortions, establish a Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), regulate the labor market, and expand coverage of transportation services, among other things.
The accord drastically altered the economic ties between the member nations, leading to a considerable rise in cross−border investment and a tripling of regional commerce. However, throughout his presidential campaign, Donald Trump painted NAFTA in a negative light, suggesting that it was the worst trade agreement ever.
What is USMCA?
President Donald Trump, who took office in January 2017, immediately began working to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with the United States−Mexico−Canada Agreement (USMCA), often known as "NAFTA 2.0" or the "New NAFTA." The new president oversaw and ordered this to be done. This contract will become effective in July 2020. The new North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) aims to govern most economic relationships in North America, including the more than $1.3 trillion worth of annual trade in goods and services, for at least the next 16 years, if not longer. It largely revises and updates the provisions of its already−signed predecessor.
Since the USMCA preserves the zero−tariff framework that NAFTA has enjoyed for the previous 25 years concerning food and agricultural items, it will provide the United States greater access to the Canadian dairy market. The most significant changes include updated provisions regarding financial services; improved environmental regulations; greater worker protection; and a provision regarding entering into free trade agreements with non−market economies; and stricter rules of origin in the textile, automobile, and apparel industries; further goods trade facilitation; and support for high−paying jobs for Americans.
Differences: NAFTA and USMCAT
The following table highlights how NAFTA is different from USMCAT −
| Characteristics | NAFTA | USMCAT |
|---|---|---|
| Rules of Origin | NAFTA mandates that 62.5 percent of a vehicle be manufactured in the nation of origin. | 75 percent or more of an automobile must be made in the nation. |
| Term | The NAFTA rules stipulated a maximum of 50 years. | The copyright duration is the shorter of the author's lifetime and 70 or 75 years following publication. |
| De Minimis Rule | The minimum value threshold for taxes and customs was established at 7%. | The "de minimis value level," below which taxes and fees are not applied, has been raised to 10%. |
| Expanded Market Access | U.S.−Canadian agriculture trade tariff removal was incomplete. | Americans who manufacture dairy goods can now sell their products freely in Canada. |
| Sunset Clause | Unlike other international trade agreements, NAFTA does not have a sunset clause. | The USMCA included a review of the agreement every six months and a sunset mechanism with a lifespan of sixteen years. |
Conclusion
As a result of increased trade and improved economic ties among member nations, most economists believe that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has been good for the North American economy. However, in the context of the wider debate over the benefits of free trade, NAFTA remains a contentious issue.
Due to these factors, the United States, led by President Donald Trump, renegotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with their allies, Canada and Mexico, to promote economic development and high−paying employment. The three countries' leaders finally came together to make good on their promises by signing a new trilateral treaty known as USMCA.
305 Views
