Article Categories
- All Categories
-
Data Structure
-
Networking
-
RDBMS
-
Operating System
-
Java
-
MS Excel
-
iOS
-
HTML
-
CSS
-
Android
-
Python
-
C Programming
-
C++
-
C#
-
MongoDB
-
MySQL
-
Javascript
-
PHP
-
Economics & Finance
Asymmetric Multiprocessing
Asymmetric multiprocessing (AMP) is a type of multiprocessor system where processors are assigned specific roles and are not treated equally. Unlike symmetric multiprocessing, where all processors can perform any task, asymmetric systems have a hierarchical structure with specialized processor functions.
How Asymmetric Multiprocessing Works
In asymmetric multiprocessing, processors have distinct roles and responsibilities. Typically, one processor acts as the master and controls the system, while other processors serve as slaves that handle specific tasks assigned by the master.
Features of Asymmetric Multiprocessing
Hierarchical Structure − Processors have a master-slave relationship where the master controls task assignment and system operations.
Specialized Roles − Each processor is assigned specific types of tasks. For example, one may handle I/O operations while another processes user applications.
Centralized Control − The master processor runs the operating system kernel and manages all other processors.
Task Assignment − Processes are assigned to specific processors based on their type and the processor's specialization.
Cost Effective − Simpler to design and implement compared to symmetric multiprocessing systems.
Comparison − Symmetric vs Asymmetric Multiprocessing
| Aspect | Symmetric Multiprocessing (SMP) | Asymmetric Multiprocessing (AMP) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor Equality | All processors are equal and identical | Processors have different roles and capabilities |
| Task Assignment | Any processor can execute any task | Tasks assigned based on processor specialization |
| Control Structure | Distributed control among all processors | Centralized control by master processor |
| Process Scheduling | Processors pick tasks from shared ready queue | Master assigns tasks to appropriate slaves |
| Failure Handling | Tasks redistributed among remaining processors | More complex - may require master reassignment |
| Design Complexity | More complex to design and implement | Simpler design with clear hierarchy |
| Cost | Higher cost due to complexity | Lower cost, easier to implement |
Advantages
Specialized Performance − Processors optimized for specific tasks can perform more efficiently.
Simple Design − Hierarchical structure is easier to implement and debug.
Lower Cost − Less expensive than symmetric multiprocessing systems.
Clear Control Flow − Centralized control makes system behavior predictable.
Disadvantages
Master Bottleneck − Master processor can become a performance bottleneck.
Single Point of Failure − If master fails, the entire system may be affected.
Load Imbalance − Some processors may be idle while others are overloaded.
Limited Scalability − Adding more processors doesn't always improve performance.
Conclusion
Asymmetric multiprocessing uses a master-slave architecture where processors have specialized roles and hierarchical control. While simpler and more cost-effective than symmetric systems, AMP can suffer from bottlenecks and load imbalances that limit scalability.
4K+ Views
