Article Categories
- All Categories
-
Data Structure
-
Networking
-
RDBMS
-
Operating System
-
Java
-
MS Excel
-
iOS
-
HTML
-
CSS
-
Android
-
Python
-
C Programming
-
C++
-
C#
-
MongoDB
-
MySQL
-
Javascript
-
PHP
-
Economics & Finance
Maximize Sum Of Array After K Negations in Python
Given an array of integers, we need to maximize the sum by negating exactly K elements. We can choose any element and replace it with its negative value, repeating this process K times.
The strategy is to first negate all negative numbers (since negating them increases the sum), then handle remaining negations optimally.
Algorithm
The approach involves these steps:
Sort the array to process negative numbers first
Negate negative numbers until K operations are exhausted or no negatives remain
If K operations remain and K is odd, negate the smallest positive number
Return the sum of the modified array
Example
Let's implement the solution ?
class Solution:
def largestSumAfterKNegations(self, nums, k):
# Sort array to handle negatives first
nums.sort()
# Negate negative numbers
for i in range(len(nums)):
if nums[i] < 0 and k > 0:
nums[i] = -nums[i]
k -= 1
if k == 0:
break
# If k is odd, negate the smallest element
if k % 2 == 1:
smallest = min(nums)
return sum(nums) - 2 * smallest
else:
return sum(nums)
# Test the solution
solution = Solution()
result = solution.largestSumAfterKNegations([3, -1, 0, 2], 3)
print(f"Maximum sum: {result}")
Maximum sum: 6
Step-by-Step Execution
Let's trace through the example with array [3, -1, 0, 2] and K = 3 ?
def trace_execution(nums, k):
print(f"Initial array: {nums}, K = {k}")
# Sort the array
nums.sort()
print(f"After sorting: {nums}")
# Negate negative numbers
original_k = k
for i in range(len(nums)):
if nums[i] < 0 and k > 0:
print(f"Negating nums[{i}] = {nums[i]} to {-nums[i]}")
nums[i] = -nums[i]
k -= 1
print(f"Array now: {nums}, remaining K = {k}")
if k == 0:
break
print(f"After negating negatives: {nums}, remaining K = {k}")
# Handle remaining operations
if k % 2 == 1:
smallest = min(nums)
result = sum(nums) - 2 * smallest
print(f"K is odd, smallest element: {smallest}")
print(f"Final sum: {sum(nums)} - 2*{smallest} = {result}")
else:
result = sum(nums)
print(f"K is even, final sum: {result}")
return result
# Trace the execution
trace_execution([3, -1, 0, 2], 3)
Initial array: [3, -1, 0, 2], K = 3 After sorting: [-1, 0, 2, 3] Negating nums[0] = -1 to 1 Array now: [1, 0, 2, 3], remaining K = 2 After negating negatives: [1, 0, 2, 3], remaining K = 2 K is even, final sum: 6
Alternative Approach Using Heap
We can also use a min-heap to always negate the smallest element ?
import heapq
def maximize_sum_heap(nums, k):
# Convert to min-heap
heapq.heapify(nums)
# Always negate the smallest element
for _ in range(k):
smallest = heapq.heappop(nums)
heapq.heappush(nums, -smallest)
return sum(nums)
# Test with heap approach
result = maximize_sum_heap([3, -1, 0, 2], 3)
print(f"Result using heap: {result}")
Result using heap: 6
Comparison
| Approach | Time Complexity | Space Complexity | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sorting | O(n log n) | O(1) | Simple implementation |
| Heap | O(k log n) | O(1) | When K << n |
Conclusion
The sorting approach efficiently maximizes the array sum by first negating negative numbers, then handling remaining operations optimally. The heap approach works better when K is much smaller than the array size.
