Article Categories
- All Categories
-
Data Structure
-
Networking
-
RDBMS
-
Operating System
-
Java
-
MS Excel
-
iOS
-
HTML
-
CSS
-
Android
-
Python
-
C Programming
-
C++
-
C#
-
MongoDB
-
MySQL
-
Javascript
-
PHP
-
Economics & Finance
Difference between COM and DCOM
Microsoft's Component Object Model (COM) and Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) are both component-based architectures that enable software reusability and interoperability on Windows platforms. While COM provides the foundation for local component interaction, DCOM extends these capabilities across network boundaries.
What is COM?
COM is Microsoft's component program architecture designed primarily for Windows. It serves as the foundation for technologies like OLE and ActiveX, enabling code reuse without recompilation. A COM component is a platform-specific binary file that conforming applications and other components can utilize.
Instead of accessing a component's underlying data structure directly, programs use standardized interfaces through pointers. This abstraction allows components to communicate regardless of their implementation language or internal workings.
COM programmers use COM-aware components identified by Class IDs (CLSIDs), which are Globally Unique Identifiers (GUIDs). Each COM component exposes its functionality through one or more interfaces, distinguished by Interface IDs (IIDs).
What is DCOM?
DCOM is an extension of COM that enables distributed computing by allowing applications to run programs on remote computers as if they were executing locally. It addresses network-related challenges through three key mechanisms:
-
Marshalling − Solves data transmission between COM objects on different machines by handling parameter passing across network boundaries.
-
Distributed Garbage Collection − Automatically manages memory by deleting completed or abandoned DCOM objects, preventing server memory exhaustion and coordinating cleanup across transaction chains.
-
DCE/RPC Protocol − Uses Distributed Computing Environment/Remote Procedure Call as the underlying communication mechanism to support high-volume network traffic.
Comparison
| Feature | COM | DCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Full Form | Component Object Model | Distributed Component Object Model |
| Execution Environment | Client-side, local machine | Server-side, distributed across network |
| Installation Requirement | Must be installed on each machine | Installed once on network-accessible server |
| Primary Purpose | Interface standard for local components | Distributed application architecture |
| Object Reusability | High reusability within local scope | Network-wide accessibility but complex management |
Conclusion
COM provides a robust foundation for component-based programming on Windows systems, while DCOM extends these capabilities to distributed environments. DCOM adds network communication features through marshalling, garbage collection, and DCE/RPC protocols, enabling seamless remote component interaction across network boundaries.
