Number of Ways to Separate Numbers - Problem
You wrote down many positive integers in a string called num. However, you realized that you forgot to add commas to separate the different numbers. You remember that the list of integers was non-decreasing and that no integer had leading zeros.

For example, if you had the string "327", it could have been originally:
[3, 27] - valid (3 ≤ 27)
[32, 7] - invalid (32 > 7)
[3, 2, 7] - invalid (3 > 2)

Return the number of possible lists of integers that you could have written down to get the string num. Since the answer may be large, return it modulo 109 + 7.

This is a challenging dynamic programming problem that requires careful handling of string comparisons and number formations.

Input & Output

example_1.py — Basic Case
$ Input: num = "327"
Output: 2
💡 Note: The two possible lists are [3, 27] and [327]. We cannot have [32, 7] because 32 > 7, and we cannot have [3, 2, 7] because 3 > 2.
example_2.py — Leading Zero Case
$ Input: num = "094"
Output: 0
💡 Note: No valid lists can be formed because any partition would start with "0" which represents a number with leading zero (except single digit 0, but "094" cannot be just "0").
example_3.py — Multiple Valid Partitions
$ Input: num = "1234"
Output: 8
💡 Note: Valid partitions are: [1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 34], [1, 23, 4] (invalid: 23 > 4), [1, 234], [12, 34], [123, 4] (invalid: 123 > 4), [1234]. After filtering invalid ones, we get 8 valid partitions.

Constraints

  • 1 ≤ num.length ≤ 3500
  • num consists of digits '0' through '9'
  • No leading zeros are allowed in any number
  • The sequence must be non-decreasing
  • Return result modulo 109 + 7

Visualization

Tap to expand
Number Separation VisualizationOriginal Problem: "327" → How many ways to add commas?✓ [3, 27] - Valid: 3 ≤ 27✗ [32, 7] - Invalid: 32 > 7✓ [327] - Valid: single number✗ [3, 2, 7] - Invalid: 3 > 2Answer: 2 valid waysDP Solution Approach:1. dp[i][j] = ways to partitionfirst i chars ending withnumber of length j2. For each position, try allvalid previous partitions3. Use LCP for fast stringcomparisonTime: O(n³), Space: O(n²)Key Optimizations:• Precompute LCP matrix forO(1) string comparisons• Handle leading zero constraintearly in DP transitions• Use modular arithmetic forlarge numbers
Understanding the Visualization
1
Identify Constraints
Numbers must be non-decreasing and have no leading zeros
2
Use Dynamic Programming
Build solutions incrementally, tracking last number length
3
Efficient Comparison
Use LCP preprocessing for fast string comparisons
4
Count All Valid Ways
Sum all possible valid partitions
Key Takeaway
🎯 Key Insight: Dynamic programming with efficient string comparison using LCP preprocessing allows us to solve this complex constraint satisfaction problem in polynomial time.
Asked in
Google 45 Amazon 32 Meta 28 Microsoft 22
28.4K Views
Medium Frequency
~35 min Avg. Time
967 Likes
Ln 1, Col 1
Smart Actions
💡 Explanation
AI Ready
💡 Suggestion Tab to accept Esc to dismiss
// Output will appear here after running code
Code Editor Closed
Click the red button to reopen