Maximum Number of Removal Queries That Can Be Processed I - Problem
The Query Processing Challenge

You're given two arrays: nums (your data array) and queries (processing requests). Your goal is to maximize the number of queries you can successfully process.

šŸŽÆ The Rules:
• One-time preprocessing: You can replace nums with any subsequence of itself (keep elements in original order)
• Query processing: Process queries in order. For each query queries[i]:
  - If both first and last elements of nums are less than queries[i], processing stops
  - Otherwise, remove either the first or last element (whichever is ≄ queries[i])

Challenge: Choose the optimal subsequence and removal strategy to process the maximum number of queries!

Example: nums = [2, 3, 2], queries = [3, 2, 1]
→ Keep subsequence [3, 2]
→ Process query 3: remove 3, left with [2]
→ Process query 2: remove 2, left with []
→ Query 1: no elements left, but we processed 2 queries!

Input & Output

example_1.py — Basic Case
$ Input: {"nums": [2, 3, 2], "queries": [3, 2, 1]}
› Output: 2
šŸ’” Note: Choose subsequence [3, 2]. Process query 3 by removing 3 (count=1), then process query 2 by removing 2 (count=2). Cannot process query 1 as no elements remain.
example_2.py — All Elements Work
$ Input: {"nums": [5, 4, 3], "queries": [3, 4, 1]}
› Output: 3
šŸ’” Note: Keep the full array [5, 4, 3]. Process query 3: remove 3 from right. Process query 4: remove 4. Process query 1: remove 5. All queries processed successfully.
example_3.py — Strategic Subsequence
$ Input: {"nums": [1, 100, 1], "queries": [90, 90]}
› Output: 1
šŸ’” Note: Choose subsequence [100]. Can process first query 90 by removing 100, but then no elements remain for the second query. Maximum achievable is 1.

Constraints

  • 1 ≤ nums.length ≤ 20
  • 1 ≤ queries.length ≤ 1000
  • 1 ≤ nums[i], queries[i] ≤ 106
  • The subsequence must maintain the original order of elements

Visualization

Tap to expand
Query Processing StrategyOriginal Array:232Optimal Subsequence [3, 2]:32LRQuery Processing:Query 3: Remove 3 (left) āœ“ Count = 1Query 2: Remove 2 (right) āœ“ Count = 2Query 1: No elements left āœ— Final = 2Why This Works:• We can only remove from ends• Contiguous intervals are optimal• Greedy end selection works• O(n²m) vs O(2ⁿm) complexityšŸ’”
Understanding the Visualization
1
Choose Your Deck
Select the best contiguous subsequence from the original array
2
Process Queries
For each query, greedily choose which end to remove from
3
Maximize Success
Find the subsequence that allows processing the most queries
Key Takeaway
šŸŽÆ Key Insight: Since we can only remove elements from the ends during processing, we only need to consider contiguous subsequences from the original array, dramatically reducing the search space from exponential to quadratic.
Asked in
Google 15 Amazon 12 Meta 8 Microsoft 6
25.8K Views
Medium Frequency
~35 min Avg. Time
890 Likes
Ln 1, Col 1
Smart Actions
šŸ’” Explanation
AI Ready
šŸ’” Suggestion Tab to accept Esc to dismiss
// Output will appear here after running code
Code Editor Closed
Click the red button to reopen