Maximum Number of Groups With Increasing Length - Problem

Imagine you're organizing a tournament where participants are grouped into teams, and each team must have a strictly increasing number of members. You have n different types of participants (numbered 0 to n-1), and each type i can only be used up to usageLimits[i] times across all teams.

Your challenge: Create the maximum number of teams possible while following these rules:

  • Each team must contain distinct participant types (no duplicates within a team)
  • Each team (except the first) must be strictly larger than the previous team
  • Don't exceed the usage limit for any participant type

Goal: Return the maximum number of teams you can create.

Example: If usageLimits = [1,2,5], you could create teams of sizes 1, 2, 3... as long as you don't run out of participants!

Input & Output

example_1.py โ€” Basic Case
$ Input: usageLimits = [1,2,5]
โ€บ Output: 3
๐Ÿ’ก Note: We can form 3 teams: Team 1 (size 1): use participant 0 once. Team 2 (size 2): use participants 1 and 2 once each. Team 3 (size 3): use participant 2 four more times (total 5) and participant 1 once more (total 2). This uses exactly the limits: [1,2,5].
example_2.py โ€” Small Limits
$ Input: usageLimits = [2,1,2]
โ€บ Output: 2
๐Ÿ’ก Note: We can form 2 teams: Team 1 (size 1): use participant 0 once. Team 2 (size 2): use participants 0 and 2 once each. We cannot form a third team of size 3 because we would need 3 distinct participants but only have participant 1 (limit 1) and participant 2 (limit 1) remaining.
example_3.py โ€” Single Element
$ Input: usageLimits = [10]
โ€บ Output: 1
๐Ÿ’ก Note: With only one type of participant, we can form at most 1 team of size 1, since each team must consist of distinct participant types.

Constraints

  • 1 โ‰ค usageLimits.length โ‰ค 105
  • 1 โ‰ค usageLimits[i] โ‰ค 109
  • Each group must have distinct elements
  • Groups must have strictly increasing lengths

Visualization

Tap to expand
Tournament Team FormationAvailable PlayersType 0: 1 useType 1: 2 usesType 2: 5 usesTotal: 8 usesTeam 1Size: 1Uses: 1Members:[Type 0]Team 2Size: 2Uses: 2Members:[Type 1, 2]Team 3Size: 3Uses: 3Members:[Type 2ร—3]Binary Search Process:Search Range: [0, 8] โ†’ Test k=4 โ†’ Can't form team of size 4Search Range: [0, 3] โ†’ Test k=3 โ†’ Success!Greedy Strategy:1. Sort by availability: [5, 2, 1] (Type 2, Type 1, Type 0)2. Team 1 (size 1): Use Type 2 (1 time) โ†’ Remaining: [4, 2, 1]3. Team 2 (size 2): Use Type 2 (1 time), Type 1 (1 time) โ†’ Remaining: [3, 1, 1]4. Team 3 (size 3): Use Type 2 (3 times) โ†’ Remaining: [0, 1, 1]Total teams formed: 3 (sizes 1, 2, 3)
Understanding the Visualization
1
Binary Search Setup
We search for the maximum number of teams between 0 and the total sum of all usage limits
2
Greedy Verification
For each candidate answer, we verify by greedily forming teams using participants with highest availability
3
Team Formation
Form teams of increasing sizes (1, 2, 3, ..., k) using distinct participants
4
Optimization
Always use participants with the most remaining availability to maximize future team formation potential
Key Takeaway
๐ŸŽฏ Key Insight: Use binary search on the answer combined with greedy verification. Always assign participants with highest availability first to maximize the potential for forming larger teams later.
Asked in
Google 42 Amazon 38 Microsoft 29 Meta 25
38.4K Views
High Frequency
~25 min Avg. Time
987 Likes
Ln 1, Col 1
Smart Actions
๐Ÿ’ก Explanation
AI Ready
๐Ÿ’ก Suggestion Tab to accept Esc to dismiss
// Output will appear here after running code
Code Editor Closed
Click the red button to reopen