IPO - Problem
IPO Capital Maximization Problem
Imagine you're the CEO of LeetCode preparing for your company's Initial Public Offering (IPO)! To attract venture capital and maximize your share price, you need to strategically complete projects to grow your capital before going public.
You have
โข A minimum capital requirement
โข A guaranteed pure profit
Starting with
Goal: Select up to
Example: With initial capital of $0 and projects requiring [$1, $2, $3] with profits of [$1, $2, $3], you might start with the cheapest project to build capital for more profitable ones!
Imagine you're the CEO of LeetCode preparing for your company's Initial Public Offering (IPO)! To attract venture capital and maximize your share price, you need to strategically complete projects to grow your capital before going public.
You have
n available projects, each with:โข A minimum capital requirement
capital[i] to start the projectโข A guaranteed pure profit
profits[i] upon completionStarting with
w initial capital, you can complete at most k projects before your IPO deadline. Each completed project adds its profit to your total capital, potentially unlocking more expensive (and profitable) projects.Goal: Select up to
k projects to maximize your final capital before the IPO.Example: With initial capital of $0 and projects requiring [$1, $2, $3] with profits of [$1, $2, $3], you might start with the cheapest project to build capital for more profitable ones!
Input & Output
example_1.py โ Basic IPO Strategy
$
Input:
k = 2, w = 0, profits = [1,2,3], capital = [0,1,1]
โบ
Output:
4
๐ก Note:
Start with $0 capital. Project 0 requires $0 and gives $1 profit โ Capital becomes $1. Now we can afford projects 1 and 2 (both need $1). Project 2 gives higher profit ($3), so select it โ Final capital: $1 + $3 = $4
example_2.py โ Capital Constraint
$
Input:
k = 3, w = 0, profits = [1,2,3], capital = [0,1,2]
โบ
Output:
6
๐ก Note:
Start with $0. Only project 0 is affordable โ Capital becomes $1. Now project 1 is affordable โ Capital becomes $3. Finally project 2 is affordable โ Final capital: $6
example_3.py โ Project Limit
$
Input:
k = 1, w = 2, profits = [1,2,3], capital = [1,1,2]
โบ
Output:
5
๐ก Note:
With $2 starting capital, we can afford projects 0, 1, and 2. Limited to k=1 project, we choose the most profitable (project 2 with profit $3) โ Final capital: $2 + $3 = $5
Constraints
- 1 โค k โค 105
- 0 โค w โค 109
- n == profits.length
- n == capital.length
- 1 โค n โค 105
- 0 โค profits[i] โค 104
- 0 โค capital[i] โค 109
- Answer is guaranteed to fit in a 32-bit signed integer
Visualization
Tap to expand
Understanding the Visualization
1
Initial Setup
Sort all projects by capital requirement in a min-heap. Start with given capital w.
2
Find Affordable Projects
Move all projects we can currently afford from the capital-heap to the profit-heap.
3
Greedy Selection
Always pick the most profitable project from available options.
4
Capital Growth
Add the project's profit to our capital, potentially unlocking more expensive projects.
5
Repeat Process
Continue for k iterations or until no more affordable projects exist.
Key Takeaway
๐ฏ Key Insight: The greedy choice (always pick the most profitable affordable project) is optimal because it maximizes capital growth at each step, unlocking the most future opportunities. This problem has optimal substructure - the best choice now leads to the best overall result.
๐ก
Explanation
AI Ready
๐ก Suggestion
Tab
to accept
Esc
to dismiss
// Output will appear here after running code