Check If a String Can Break Another String - Problem

You are given two strings s1 and s2 of equal length. Your task is to determine if some permutation of s1 can "break" some permutation of s2, or vice versa.

A string x can break string y (both of size n) if x[i] >= y[i] (in alphabetical order) for all positions i from 0 to n-1.

Think of it as a character-by-character comparison where each character in string x must be alphabetically greater than or equal to the corresponding character in string y.

Example: String "cbd" can break string "abc" because 'c' >= 'a', 'b' >= 'b', and 'd' >= 'c'.

Input & Output

example_1.py — Basic Case
$ Input: s1 = "abc", s2 = "xya"
Output: true
💡 Note: We can arrange s1 as "ayx" and s2 as "abc". Then "yxa" can break "abc" since y≥a, x≥b, a≥c is false, but "yxa" vs "abc" gives us y≥a(true), x≥b(true), a≥c(false). Actually, s2="xya" can be arranged as "yxa" which can break s1="abc" arranged as "abc".
example_2.py — Cannot Break
$ Input: s1 = "abe", s2 = "acd"
Output: false
💡 Note: No permutation of s1 can break any permutation of s2, and vice versa. Best case for s1: "eba" vs s2: "acd" gives e≥a(true), b≥c(false). Best case for s2: "dca" vs s1: "abe" gives d≥a(true), c≥b(true), a≥e(false).
example_3.py — Edge Case Equal
$ Input: s1 = "leetcodee", s2 = "interview"
Output: true
💡 Note: String s2 can break s1. When optimally arranged: s2 sorted desc vs s1 sorted asc allows s2 to break s1 since we have enough strong characters in s2 to match weak characters in s1.

Visualization

Tap to expand
Card Battle: String Breaking StrategyRound 1: Player 1 (s1="cab") tries to beat Player 2 (s2="def")CStrongDWeakC < DBEAFPlayer 1 loses all battles!Round 2: Player 2 (s2="def") tries to beat Player 1 (s1="cab")FStrongAWeakF ≥ AEBDCPlayer 2 wins all battles!💡 Winning Strategy:• Arrange your strongest cards against opponent's weakest cards• This greedy approach guarantees the best possible outcome• Much faster than trying every possible arrangement!
Understanding the Visualization
1
Deal the cards
Each player gets letter cards: Player 1 has 'cab', Player 2 has 'def'
2
Optimal strategy
To win, Player 1 arranges strongest cards first: 'c', 'b', 'a'. Player 2 arranges weakest first: 'd', 'e', 'f'
3
Battle comparison
Compare position by position: c vs d (lose), b vs e (lose), a vs f (lose). Player 1 cannot win.
4
Reverse roles
Now Player 2 tries to win: arranges 'f', 'e', 'd' vs Player 1's 'a', 'b', 'c'. All battles won!
Key Takeaway
🎯 Key Insight: Use greedy sorting strategy - arrange strongest characters against weakest opponents to maximize breaking potential in O(n log n) time instead of O(n!) permutation generation.

Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity
⏱️
O(n! × n! × n)

Generate n! permutations for each string, then compare each pair in O(n) time

n
2n
Quadratic Growth
Space Complexity
O(n! × n)

Store all permutations of both strings

n
2n
Quadratic Space

Constraints

  • s1.length == s2.length
  • 1 ≤ s1.length ≤ 105
  • All strings consist of lowercase English letters only
Asked in
Google 45 Amazon 38 Microsoft 32 Meta 28
39.0K Views
Medium Frequency
~18 min Avg. Time
1.8K Likes
Ln 1, Col 1
Smart Actions
💡 Explanation
AI Ready
💡 Suggestion Tab to accept Esc to dismiss
// Output will appear here after running code
Code Editor Closed
Click the red button to reopen