- Trending Categories
- Data Structure
- Operating System
- MS Excel
- C Programming
- Social Studies
- Fashion Studies
- Legal Studies
- Selected Reading
- UPSC IAS Exams Notes
- Developer's Best Practices
- Questions and Answers
- Effective Resume Writing
- HR Interview Questions
- Computer Glossary
- Who is Who
Neuroscience and Genetics of Childhood Maltreatment
A growing corpus of research has looked into how stress, especially various types of childhood abuse, might affect neuronal structure and function. These studies have included children who have been abused and adults who have reported childhood experiences of early trauma. There is mounting evidence linking childhood abuse to several neurological abnormalities.
On the one hand, such alterations might be interpreted as a cascade of negative consequences damaging to the kid; nevertheless, a more evolutionary and developmentally informed perspective would imply that such changes are, in fact, adaptive reactions to a threat-filled early environment. Early stress-induced modifications in neurobiological systems can be viewed as 'programming' or calibrating those systems to fit the demands of a hostile environment if a child is to respond appropriately to the difficulties given by his/her circumstances.
Cortical Structures: The Prefrontal Cortex and Cerebellum
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) regulates cognitive and affective processes through extensive linkages with other cortical and subcortical areas, hence vital in controlling many aspects of behaviour. Some researchers compared the PFC volume of children with maltreatment-related PTSD versus non-maltreated children are found equivocal. Recent research has found lower prefrontal volume and less prefrontal white matter in maltreated people.
In contrast, other studies have found higher grey matter volume in the middle-inferior and ventral areas of the PFC in maltreated people. There are plausible explanations for these inconsistencies, and it is probable that methodological variations between studies, such as using different imaging methods and age groups of children, account for at least some of the observed variances.
Subcortical Structures: Hippocampus and Amygdala
Animal studies have revealed that the hippocampus plays a vital role in learning and memory and that these abilities are compromised when animals are subjected to persistent stress. Adults with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who have a history of childhood maltreatment, an early type of stress, have decreased hippocampus volumes, according to studies. It is so unexpected that structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) investigations of children and adolescents with maltreatment-related PTSD fail to find reduced hippocampus volume regularly.
It is conceivable that the effects of stress are delayed and appear later in development. Another important subcortical structure, the amygdala, analyses potentially hazardous information, fear conditioning, emotional processing, and memory. Given that maltreatment typically occurs in family environments characterized by unpredictability and threat, it is reasonable to expect that children growing up in such environments would have increased amygdala volume, similar to that found in stress-exposed animals, which have increased dendritic arborization.
Corpus Callosum and Other White Matter Tracts
The corpus callosum (CC) is the brain's most prominent white matter structure, controlling interhemispheric communication of various functions such as arousal, emotion, and higher cognitive capacities. Except for one research, maltreated children and adolescents consistently show lower CC volume than their non-maltreated counterparts.
Further, DTI investigations have identified changes in maltreated children's frontal and temporal white matter areas, including the uncinate fasciculus, which connects the orbitofrontal cortex to the anterior temporal lobe, including the amygdala. The degree of the white matter changes reported by Govindan and colleagues was related to longer stays in an orphanage and may explain some of the socio-emotional and cognitive deficits observed in maltreated youngsters.
The HPA axis in Rodent and Primate Studies
Long-term impacts of manipulating mother-pup relationships on HPA functioning have been documented in rodent research. Brief durations of handling during infancy (up to 15 minutes per day) boost development because these animals become adults with fewer behavioral signs of anxiety and a more efficient HPA response to environmental stresses. These effects are partly mediated by increased GR expression in the hippocampus and occur in conjunction with other neurobiological alterations, such as the increased amplitude of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus.
However, repeated or prolonged durations of parental separation have negative consequences, most notably increased or decreased HPA axis activity. Some identified alterations in HPA functioning include more excellent glucocorticoid response to future stressors, higher plasma ACTH levels, less GR in the hippocampus, and changes in CRF mRNA expression. These data suggest that considerable disturbance in maternal care throughout the early stages of life is linked to altered HPA axis functioning. The date and duration of separation are critical considerations, with earlier and longer separation often having more significant negative implications.
Along with these neurobiological alterations, there has been an increase in anxiety-like behavior, hypervigilance, and moderate cognitive deficits. Notably, the quality of the mother's behaviors observed during the reunion is one component that might attenuate the pup's stress experience. Greater levels of mother licking and grooming behavior in adults are related to a decreased HPA response to stress; moreover, such maternal practices negatively connect with pup fearfulness and degree of cognitive impairment.
In other words, high amounts of licking and grooming are related to stress-resilient puppies. These findings from rodent research show that maternal involvement and separation significantly impact the development and modulation of the pup's current and adult HPA system response to stress.
The Role of Genetic Influences
It is a typical but often startling therapeutic experience to discover that two children with similar patterns of early trauma have had dramatically different outcomes. While this may be due to distinct environmental or psychological circumstances that characterize one kid but not the other, there is growing evidence that such disparities in outcome may be attributed, at least in part, to genetic variations.
Many mental outcomes linked with maltreatment, such as PTSD, depression, and antisocial behaviour, are now shown to be heritable. It is, however, wrong to believe that specific genes cause these disorders. Instead, we are discovering many genetic variations that may slightly modify the structure and functioning of brain circuitry and hormone systems. These are critical in calibrating our unique response to social-emotional signals and regulating our stress response.
Researchers have recently focused on the interactions between such genetic variations and harsh surroundings. Such gene-environment interaction research has shown that for various genetic variations (called polymorphisms), childhood maltreatment might enhance the likelihood of later psychopathology in confident children more than others.
Caspi and colleagues, for example, were the first to report on an interaction of a measured genotype (MAOA, monoamine oxidase A) and environment (maltreatment) for a psychiatric outcome, demonstrating that people who carry the low-activity allele (MAOA-l) are more likely to develop antisocial behaviour disorders after maltreatment.
According to imaging genetic research, the risk genotype, MAOA-l, is associated with hyper-responsivity of the brain's danger detection system and decreased activity in emotion control circuits. This study indicates a brain mechanism through which the MAOA genotype causes reactive violence after abuse.
Childhood abuse has been linked to neurological abnormalities, including the decreased hippocampus and amygdala volume and increased prefrontal cortex and cerebellum volume. These changes may be adaptive reactions to a hostile environment, increasing susceptibility to psychopathology. Recent research has found inconsistencies between prefrontal and grey matter volumes in maltreated people, possibly due to methodological variations and geographically specific windows of susceptibility in brain development.
Abused children are at risk for psychopathology due to decreased cognitive control and increased subcortical reactions during emotional processing. Genetic variations may modify the structure and functioning of brain circuitry and hormone systems, enhancing the likelihood of later psychopathology.
Kickstart Your Career
Get certified by completing the courseGet Started