Mob Psychology and Crowd Control


Whenever there is a large gathering, say a concert or a political rally, how do we ensure that these groups of people stay sane and engage in peaceful conversations? The capability to manage a group or swarm without infringing human rights represents the most challenging task that law enforcement authorities must complete. Law enforcement organizations must study the population's behavior to control the crowd using solely physical force properly. Recognizing mob psychology can aid law enforcement organizations and mediators in properly observing and interacting with a mob. A conceptual model called "mob psychology" aims to explain group behavior only in terms of the psychological conditions of the participants. Crowd psychology and group mentality are words comparable to mob psychology, and numerous literary works, notably Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, depict it.

What is Mob Psychology?

According to a study on mob psychology, people typically act differently in a group setting than they do on their own. Group members frequently engage in behaviors that they consider unethical or unfair if they oversaw their actions. This is not because someone's belief or principle has changed; rather, people prefer to disregard or reject their conscience or good judgment. It may be claimed that group members put aside their objectives and adopt the organization's identity. Therefore, individuals in a group are more likely to do things they would never do alone. People can apportion blame, liability, obligation, and assessment to the group when they are part of a group.

There are numerous instances of mob psychology in contemporary life. The Holocaust's treatment of Jews serves as one illustration. The Nazi party attributed the precarious state of Germany's economy back then to Jews. How much an entire community came to oppress their Jewish neighbors is a question that experts and academics have long considered.


Initial studies

Modern crowd science typically refers to the energizing "mob" mentality that appears to trump a person's own opinions and realities when sizable crowds congregate. These early discussions on crowding between eminent criminologists Scipio Sighele and Gabriel Tarde are largely responsible for this relatively negative perspective. These early debates focus on establishing criminal responsibility and accountability for acts committed by sizable crowds. Gustave Le Bon elaborated on these concepts by claiming that autocrats like Hitler and Mussolini used crowd psychology techniques to obtain strength and authority. He emphasized the fundamental idea that served as the basis for this theory: people frequently forfeit their sense of self-worth and accountability when they join "the mob." In his writings, he argues that by joining the throng, a person figuratively falls down the social hierarchy and lets their emotional, primal state rule.

Causes

There are a few reasons why we can fall victim to mob mentality. It is more probable that we will refrain from speaking up if doing so puts us at risk. This risk could be minor, like receiving unkind glances, or significant, like receiving punishment. We will not likely try to fit in with a group we have little in common. We can find ourselves in several circumstances that could make us more susceptible to mob mentality.

  • The group is dealing with a challenging circumstance.

  • Group leadership can be oppressive or threatening.

  • Every decision made by the group tends to be accepted.

  • There is no set procedure for making decisions.

  • There is no interaction outside of the group.

What Indicates This?

Mob mentality can be simple to recognize from a distance. We can keep an eye out for these indicators

    Optimism ignoring dangers (feeling invulnerable)

    Frequent justification of opposing viewpoints

    The conviction that everyone should be held to the group's moral standards

    Self-censorship to keep things as they are

    Belief in the fantasy that everyone agrees

Examples from Real Life

Numerous real-world scenarios allow for the observation of crowd psychology. The way that crowds react in times of disaster constitutes one of the fascinating phenomena. Traditional sociological theories predict that scared populations will act irrationally, selfishly, and in a primitive defense mode. The contrary is true, according to several research. Surprisingly, those leaving the World Trade Center following the 9/11 terrorist attacks did so systematically, saving numerous lives. Rioting is a crucial crowding phenomenon to examine. According to the US Riot Commission report from 1968, rioters were "petty criminals, hyperactive societal miscreants, or riff-raff," which was a significant endorsement of early crowding theories. According to historical data, social networks that are established and stable are more likely to be in place when riots occur than those that are chaotic. The majority of the rioters in the 1960s American riots originated from among the most stable and respected social groups, according to research on those unrests.

Long before the tragic growth of the Nazi mindset throughout World War II, the effects of groupthink fascinated psychologists, sociologists, and historians. The detrimental effects of the "crowd mentality" have received much study since the beginning. Crowd psychology, including how it might help people advance socially, respond to crises, and peacefully protect themselves, still has much to be studied.

Theories

Major theoires are:

Contagion Theory

It contends that crowds have a hypnotic effect on those who are a part of them, leading to illogical and emotionally volatile behavior frequently referred to as "crowd frenzy."

Convergence Theory

This contends that crowd behavior is the outcome of like-minded people banding together rather than being an emerging characteristic of the crowd. If it turns violent, it is not because the audience incited it; rather, it is because enough individuals desired it to be violent that they gathered in a mob.

Emergent-Norm Theory

This theory mixes the two above and claims that like-minded people and anonymity influence crowd behavior and shared emotions.

Methods to Prevent Mob Mentality

It could feel counterintuitive to resist mob mentality. There are resources we may utilize to assist stop mob mentality, including.

  • Stress the importance of considering people's opinions.

  • Determine and evaluate any implicit guidelines or presumptions in our group.

  • Recognize our biases regularly.

  • Exercise making decisions.

  • Do not punish those who differ or are sincere.

Conclusion

From the early study of harmful social groups, social scientists' discipline of mob psychology has advanced to investigating masses in more politically reactive or acute settings. There is still much to be learned in this fascinating field of research because earlier studies needed to account for the more beneficial social influences that groupings can have on a person's conduct. However, the field is becoming more relevant daily with more such instances of mob issues.

Updated on: 22-Dec-2022

869 Views

Kickstart Your Career

Get certified by completing the course

Get Started
Advertisements